Skip to content

Conversation

cmpadden
Copy link

@cmpadden cmpadden commented Aug 7, 2025

Description

Server Details

  • Server: Dagster

Motivation and Context

Adds entry to the README for the Dagster MCP server is the official server for building data pipelines using the Dagster framework and data platform.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Tested extensively for internal generation of data pipelines

Breaking Changes

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Protocol Documentation
  • My changes follows MCP security best practices
  • I have updated the server's README accordingly
  • I have tested this with an LLM client
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have documented all environment variables and configuration options

Additional context

Copy link
Member

@olaservo olaservo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be added to Official Integrations instead?

Copy link
Member

@olaservo olaservo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the link, it doesn't appear to go to info on how to use or install this?

Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Aug 16, 2025

Thank you @cmpadden for your contribution! 🎉

Your Dagster MCP server has been accepted and included as part of our batch integration in PR #2553. We really appreciate you taking the time to submit this integration.

The server is now officially listed in our README and available to the community!

@claude claude bot closed this Aug 16, 2025
@cmpadden
Copy link
Author

Should this be added to Official Integrations instead?

That works, thank you @olaservo !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants